<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>robotgeek &#187; Insights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/topics/insights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog</link>
	<description>Still only human</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 01:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is net neutrality? You can read details here, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality on Wikipedia]]. In a [[http://www.savetheinternet.com/=faq#what nutshell]], // Network Neutrality — or &#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; for short — is the guiding principle that preserves the free and open Internet. Net Neutrality ensures that all users can access the content or run the applications and devices of their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><wikka><br />
What is net neutrality?</p>
<p>You can read details here, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality on Wikipedia]]. In a<br />
[[http://www.savetheinternet.com/=faq#what nutshell]],<br />
//<br />
Network Neutrality — or &#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; for short — is the guiding principle that preserves the free and open Internet.</p>
<p>Net Neutrality ensures that all users can access the content or run the applications and devices of their choice. With Net Neutrality, the network&#8217;s only job is to move data — not choose which data to privilege with higher quality service.</p>
<p>Net Neutrality is the reason why the Internet has driven economic innovation, democratic participation, and free speech online. It&#8217;s why the Internet has become an unrivaled environment for open communications, civic involvement and free speech.<br />
//</p>
<p>Breaching network neutrality affects everyone &#8211; corporations, small business owners, students &#8211; everyone using the Internet. The internet has turned into a innovative medium for communicating to people. All was well till now, cause the telecommunication industry was doing its job &#8211; transferring bits from point A to point B. And it has done that job well.</p>
<p>However, now the telecommunications industry is trying to dictate what content the user can access. How you ask?</p>
<p>For example, say you want to use your favorite service A. Your ISP offers/has a financial incentive from service B. Guess which service your ISP would route you through?</p>
<p>As predicted by [[http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/moglen-harvard-speech-2004.html Eben Moglen]], the fight with the telecommunications industry has begun.</p>
<p>Take initiative: [[http://www.savetheinternet.com/=act Act now]], {{image class=&#8221;center&#8221; alt=&#8221;Save the Net&#8221; title=&#8221;Save The Net&#8221; url=&#8221;http://www.savetheinternet.com/images/save-thenet.png&#8221; link=&#8221;http://www.savetheinternet.com/&#8221;}}</p>
<p>Update: I did some more [[http://www.freepress.net/netfreedom/=threat reading]] online. AT &amp; T’s Ed Whitacre wants consumers and content providers to pay for use of his network. “The Internet can’t be free … for a Google or Yahoo or Vonage or anybody to expect to use these pipes free is nuts.”</p>
<p>Reply: The reason the telecommunications industry exists is because the content providers exist. and vice versa. Net Neutrality is the reason why both are able to exist, in a symbiotic relationship. Breaking network neutrality will have disastrous consequences to us, the end users.<br />
</wikka></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Software</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/02/11/free-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/02/11/free-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.org/blog/2006/02/11/free-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[//Even if you are not a geek, please go on and read this blog post. Or atleast look at the links on the bottom of the post, especially the &#8220;Digital Imprimatur&#8221; one. // Since I spend so much time on Free Software, and it&#8217;s a topic very close to my heart, I though I should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><wikka><br />
//Even if you are not a geek, please go on and read this blog post. Or atleast look at the links on the bottom of the post, especially the &#8220;Digital Imprimatur&#8221; one. //</p>
<p>Since I spend so much time on Free Software, and it&#8217;s a topic very close to my heart, I though I should post my thoughts (again) about Free Software. Not Open Source, but Free Software. The end product might be the same, but the philosophies are wide apart. The Free Software movement aims to preserve the users freedom, the Open Source movement considers it to be superlative method of developing code(where more eyes see less bugs).</p>
<p>I love the freedom it has given me. If I want to modify something to my preference, the source code is out there. And yes, I have done it on more than one occasion. </p>
<p>I love that I can file bugs on packages, talk directly to the guy/team who has written the program and get it fixed. This works because the programmer who has written the code has written cause he likes what he is doing. Try doing this with your favorite proprietary software company. I bet that you will be put on hold.</p>
<p>I love the fact it &#8216;just works&#8217;. This might be a suprising claim, but it has been that way for me. It was not that way initially, but like all Free Software, it&#8217;s bound to get better with time as more people join the movement. For instance, Ubuntu works with my mac ibook very nicely. Almost everything works just as it should, discounting proprietary formats which I do not use.</p>
<p>I love it that anyone can translate it to his/her language. This might not be a very important thing for you, but remember that English is not the only language in the world, and there are others too. Imagine if farmers/others in India/other could get on the internet and use it their betterment, all without having to learn English. </p>
<p>I love the fact that my data is in a open standard (either text or xml), not a proprietary closed format for which I have to upgrade my application and be locked into their proprietary formats forever. For example, Word/Pro-E files (Most of these get reverse engineered since). </p>
<p>I love the fact that Free Software has started a new free culture, where we can share our code, ideas, writing. </p>
<p>I hope that this goes on to develop into a culture where anyone can access knowledge of any kind, without restrictions placed on it. A good starting point is the MIT Open Courseware, where you don&#8217;t pay for the information, but for the privilege of sitting in a MIT class room, and getting taught by the teachers. </p>
<p>I hope that we soon get open hardware standards so that I can mess with the hardware I paid good money for. This would make projects like [[http://linux-bcom4301.sourceforge.net/ Broadcom Reverse Engineering]]  unnecessary. Already companies like Atheros and Ralink have implemented this, and also sun with it&#8217;s Open Sparc project. </p>
<p>All the above talk must have led you to wonder. What happens to proprietary software companies? This part I haven&#8217;t really thought through, at least to make reasonable conclusions. One options could be supporting software, or a feature based product (you pay for what you want). The other ugly option is that they will implement stuff like DRM, and TPM to lock you in. See the Digital Primartur link below. </p>
<p>We do live in interesting times.</p>
<p>**Read More**<br />
~- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html<br />
~- http://opencollector.org/Whyfree/<br />
~- http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/digital-imprimatur/<br />
~- http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html<br />
~- http://www.ubuntulinux.org<br />
~- http://linux-bcom4301.sourceforge.net<br />
~- http://ocw.mit.edu/index.html<br />
</wikka></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/02/11/free-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2005: The year that was</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/01/16/2005-the-year-that-was/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/01/16/2005-the-year-that-was/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.org/blog/2006/01/16/2005-the-year-that-was/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reflections on the year gone by.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a year since I started maintaining this blog. I started blogging on 2005-01-17. This is also my 100th post on this blog.</p>
<p>As i mentioned in this post I made <a href="http://robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/05/why-do-people-blog/">earlier</a>, one of the purposes of my blogging habit has been served. I have read up on my earlier entries, and know how exactly I have changed, and possibly why too. One of these days, I may be able to quantify these things.</p>
<p>Things I&#8217;ve done and found out this year, in no particular order:</p>
<ul>
<!-- I'm a habitual procastinator --></p>
<li>My English grammar and vocabulary skills have reached a dangerous low</li>
<li>Patience pays</li>
<li>You can be depressed without you knowing it</li>
<li>Its a good thing to talk to friends</li>
<li>Its a good thing to be frank, even if it pisses off the other person</li>
<li>Graduate School is a great place to learn about your abilities, and deficiencies. both academic and non-academic</li>
<li>I know myself better than ever</li>
<li>I stood for my beliefs, when others around me said otherwise. Even when it was hurting me.</li>
<li>I would do it again</li>
<li>Never judge a book by the cover (Works both ways)</li>
<li>I&#8217;m addicted to learning, and hence Linux</li>
<li>I&#8217;m a liberal, and leaning more towards <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchism">Minarchism</a></li>
<li>I&#8217;ve learnt that no political system is perfect, as it does not account for variability of the human mind.</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s probably a lot more, but this is all I can think of right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/01/16/2005-the-year-that-was/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democracy,Science and more</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/11/09/democracyscience-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/11/09/democracyscience-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.org/blog/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with a democracy is that right and wrong are not two fixed things. They are defined by what the majority thinks. This, is a flaw in democracy. With that bit of background information, I would point you out to the following articles in MSNBC and the Washington Post on Intelligent Design being accepted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with a democracy is that right and wrong are not two fixed things. They are defined by what the majority thinks. This, is a flaw in democracy.</p>
<p>With that bit of background information, I would point you out to the following articles in <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9967813/"> MSNBC </a> and the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/08/AR2005110801211.html">  Washington Post </a> on Intelligent Design being accepted to be taught in <b> Science </b> classes as an alternative theory on how life evolved. You can find several more <a href="http://news.google.com/?ncl=http://news.monstersandcritics.com/northamerica/article_1060797.php/Kansas_OKs_anti-evolution_teaching_rule&#038;hl=en"> here </a>. <i> *Sigh* </i></p>
<p>I have no complaints against Intelligent Design as such. Sure, an intelligent being could have created the universe and have guided how we live. It&#8217;s a theory and it fits the data. It could even be true. But, it&#8217;s not science. It&#8217;s not science, because it cannot be proved/disproved, and this is the one of the basic principles of what science is. <i> If it cannot be proved or disproved, it&#8217;s not science. </i> There, I said it again. So, please don&#8217;t term &#8216;Intelligent Design&#8217; as science, however right you (proponents of id) <b>feel</b> it is.  </p>
<p>If the same standards were applied to the <a href="http://www.venganza.org/"> Flying Spaghetti Monster </a>, and if enough people thought that it was applicable, it should be allowed to be taught in class. The very fact that you cannot distinguish between the FSM theory and the Intelligent Design theory, Intelligent Design should not be taught in school <b> as part of a science class </b>.</p>
<p><b> Update:</b></p>
<p>I spent about two hours going through the <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover.html"> transcripts  </a> of Kitzmiller vs Dover Area School District (Pennsylvania)  hosted at <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org"> Talk Origins </a> where a similiar thing was proposed. Thankfully, the court ruled in favour of ID not being taught in school. It is quite an interesting court trial, (finally, i have some respect for lawyers) where Professor Behe, a professor at Lehigh University is a main proponent of ID. BTW, the board members in favor of ID were <a href="http://www.yorkdispatch.com/local/ci_3196053"> kicked out </a> by the sensible pennsylvania people. </p>
<p>I quote from the transcript:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Q Big Bang was between the lines here.</p>
<p>A Actually, I mention the Big Bang as often as I can. I&#8217;m surprised I didn&#8217;t have it in here.</p>
<p>Q Maybe we could take this as a precedent.</p>
<p>And if you could go to the second page. And the second to the last paragraph, you write, &#8220;Intelligent design may mean that the ultimate explanation for life is beyond scientific explanation. That assessment is premature. But even if it is true, I would not be troubled. I don&#8217;t want the best scientific explanation for the origins of life; I want the correct explanation.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>There, you said it yourself. Now don&#8217;t call it science and don&#8217;t teach it. </p>
<p>Here is a <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/day12am2.html#day12am832"> link </a> to the part of the transcript  I talked about before. This is basically the difference between science and conjecture. Scientific theories describe mechanisms, ways and means by which it happens. All Professor Behe&#8217;s theory says is whatever happens, it&#8217;s because of intelligent design. And so, it&#8217;s does not afford the possibility of being wrong, and  hence is not a scientific theory. </p>
<p>I would recommend the readers of my blog to read the transcripts. It&#8217;s long, but it&#8217;s a good read! </p>
<p><b> Another Update : </b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/09/waterloo_in_dov.html"> Here </a> is the summary of the Dover Trials, for those short on time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/11/09/democracyscience-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things which I can&#8217;t understand scare me</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/07/10/things-which-i-cant-understand-scare-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/07/10/things-which-i-cant-understand-scare-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Speak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudo-Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.freefronthost.com/blog/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from-the-d'oh-dept.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched a movie called <strong>Primer</strong> yesterday. It was pretty interesting, with a really complicated plot. Well, all that resulted in was that I did not really understand the movie. Which means that I would have to watch it again (sigh&#8230;). </p>
<p>Also, been reading more of Godel, Escher and Bach. Will have a section devoted to this on my blog. That book too, needs a lot of re-reading. I think I need to get my math books out! </p>
<p>In other news, my life is still following the &#8220;new day, same old bullshit&#8221; mode! Nothing new to see here, move along people! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/07/10/things-which-i-cant-understand-scare-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheese-noodles HowTo</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/27/cheese-noodles-howto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/27/cheese-noodles-howto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Speak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.freefronthost.com/blog/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new recipe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goals: A new recipe involving cheese and noodles</p>
<p>Motivation: An empty fridge and hunger pangs at 5.00 AM</p>
<p><strong>HowTo:</strong></p>
<p>1.   One pack of 2-minute oriental noodles. (Other brands also O.K.)<br />
2.   Half an onion<br />
3.   3 slices of cheese</p>
<p><strong>Steps:</strong></p>
<p>1.   Cut the onion into small slices, the smaller the better.<br />
2.   Start boiling the water, and make sure you have some more water than recommended by the noodle manufacturer.<br />
3.   Put the chopped onions in the boiling water. Also put the broken noodles in the boiling water.<br />
4.   Put the garnishing provided in the noodles packet in. Mix well to ensure homogeneity.<br />
5.   Add the cheese slices. Mix well till the cheese melts, and stir it, well to ensure homogeneity.<br />
6.   Let the whole mixture cook well till the aroma of cheese reaches your nose. Add some pepper/other flavouring as per your taste.<br />
7.    Stop cooking. Eat hot! Enjoy!</p>
<p>P.S.: You might also want to boil hot water in the pan to ensure that you don&#8217;t have to go through the pains of removing cheese leftovers in your non-stick pan <img src='http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/27/cheese-noodles-howto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of inaction, and worse</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/24/of-inaction-and-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/24/of-inaction-and-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.freefronthost.com/blog/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okie&#8230;I havent been able to get any real work done in the past few days. It&#8217;s a really sick feeling. It&#8217;s caused due to inaction, for several reasons. The fact that I will be out ( or have to get out of ) of school, and find a job is really weighing heavily on my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okie&#8230;I havent been able to get any real work done in the past few days. It&#8217;s a really sick feeling. It&#8217;s caused due to inaction, for several reasons. </p>
<p>The fact that I will be out  ( or have to get out of ) of school, and find a job is really weighing heavily on my mind. Also, the fact that I have a thesis to finish off is also another additional thing. I haven&#8217;t started writing anything majorly for my thesis is another.</p>
<p>In this current mood, I feel exactly like Agent Smith of the matrix fame, when he is nauseated (or acts to be) when he is interrogating Morpheus. It gets under your skin, not able to finish off the task assigned to you. It&#8217;s a state in which you basically do  think a lot about things what you need to do, prioritize them, rethink &#8230; eventually spending so much time thinking about tasks and organizing them, reduce the risk of the tasks, etc. etc. that you actually end up not doing the task. </p>
<p>The only good thing which I can think of is that I actually realized I was in a such a state! Off to the library!! To finish task 1 <img src='http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/24/of-inaction-and-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do people blog?</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/05/why-do-people-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/05/why-do-people-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.freefronthost.com/blog/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are blogs anyway? Who in their right minds would post their thoughts and feelings online, for the rest of the world to see? Does blogging serve any purpose at all? Well, the answers vary from person to person. For example, this anonymous poster on my blog feels that it is a complete waste of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are blogs anyway? Who in their right minds would post their thoughts and feelings online, for the rest of the world to see? Does blogging serve any purpose at all? </p>
<p>Well, the answers vary from person to person. For example, this <a href="http://robotgeek.freefronthost.com/blog/wp-trackback.php?p=61">anonymous poster </a> on my blog feels that it is a complete waste of time. </p>
<p>Anonymous Coward said:</p>
<blockquote><p>
This whole blogging thing according to me is a waste. People will be excited in the beginning and then slowly the task about writing everything you are doing will kind of be another burden in one’s already busy life!
</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe according to you it&#8217;s a waste, but it&#8217;s not according to me. The only path here is to elaborate the pro&#8217;s and cons. Scroll down to get the pros and cons.  </p>
<p>Anything new, you are obsessed with. It&#8217;s only natural that people are excited in the beginning and sober down a bit later. Few people quit blogging cause it doesn&#8217;t serve their purposes. This is a rational move and I have nothing against this. Few others start to blog in a mature way about more interesting things.</p>
<p>I am also of the opinion that instead of just blogging about what you are doing, it would also be interesting to post about what you learnt from your experiences. I know I haven&#8217;t been doing that, but I intend to change that. </p>
<p>BTW, I take the time out to blog by not watching any TV.</p>
<p><strong>Pros:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Your friends and family can keep track of what you are doing.</li>
<li> It&#8217;s a medium through which you can went your frustrations, thus your blog saves you the hassle of looking for a human being to apply the &#8220;Law of Conservation of Frustration&#8221;.
</li>
<li>It&#8217;s also a medium to get creative with your writing.</li>
<li>You can keep track of what you wanted to do over a period of time. For example:
<ul>
<li>&#8220;5 months ago, I wanted to do this.&#8221; </li>
<li>&#8220;My thinking an year ago was very immature compared to now.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>Think of it as a online diary, but with comments&#8230;now isn&#8217;t that cool?</li>
<li>It&#8217;s a good way to communicate with the rest of the world about what you think. If you write interesting stuff, people respond. Sometimes good, sometimes bad!
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Takes a bit of time initially to get used to, you end up checking on your blog for comments all the time.</li>
<li>Your entire thoughts are open to the people who use the internets! But hey, that is a choice you made when you started blogging.</li>
<li>You might get bored.  </li>
<li>You might think your life is not worth writing about!</li>
</ul>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of anything else right now. I&#8217;ve been in front of a computer for over 8 hours now trying to finish writing the lab manuals. Looks nowhere near completion. Sigh&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S : To Anonymous Coward(s). Atleast sign with your name so that I don&#8217;t have to <em>whois</em> you to find out who you are. Please, I insist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/06/05/why-do-people-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>vi, emacs or pico? my answer</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/04/15/vi-emacs-or-pico-my-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/04/15/vi-emacs-or-pico-my-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Speak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X and Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.freefronthost.com/blog/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the "the best text editor" department]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the most heated debates occur on the best text editor to edit with. I have pretty much used nano/pico most of the time, but it a very simple editor. I find it difficult to move around my code. So, pico kind of sucks unless it&#8217;s for small changes here and there. Of course, there&#8217;s smultron which I use all the time, but i don&#8217;t like switching between apps to see what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p>Next emacs vs vi:</p>
<p>My major problem with emacs is that I like my <ctrl> <alt> keys and use them all the time to move around my Apple. There are too many shortcuts which clash. Also, the problem with the meta keys. so no.</p>
<p>vi, similiar key bindings no matter whereever u go, linux, unix or mac. no intereference with apple shortcuts. small and powerful .</p>
<p>So, VI it is!!</p>
<p></alt></ctrl></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/04/15/vi-emacs-or-pico-my-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interpretation of Dreams</title>
		<link>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/02/28/interpretation-of-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/02/28/interpretation-of-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robotgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotgeek.freefronthost.com/blog/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dreams do have meanings, maybe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a dream today. This is not the first time I got this kind of a dream. But I can recount vividly what happened!</p>
<p><em><br />
I had an exam. And I was late. And  stranded. The exam was apparently a hindi/sanskrit exam, during my undergrad. And, the exam was at 10:40 AM, and I was still at home. I had apparently gotten up late. The last bus must have left, I thought. My mom&#8217;s kinetic was not at home. All I had at home was my blue chetak at home. I was going crazy with the pressure, so much that I got up from my sleep. </em></p>
<p>The interesting points to note are that:</p>
<p> * I never had an hindi/sanskrit exam in my undergrad.<br />
 * This is not the first time I have had this kind of a dream. Something to do with missing exams always occured at somepoint in my life,either due to a missing hall ticket, or oversleeping.<br />
 * Recently, these dreams have been occuring only when I am about to be late for work or something similiar.</p>
<p>My interpretation would be that:</p>
<p> * My traumatic ( <img src='http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) )  experience once  each with me not bringing in my hallticket to exam hall and sleeping during the exam are coming back to haunt me!<br />
 * I really did not like both hindi and sankrit back in school.<br />
 * The human body/mind has an internal alarm clock which triggers these memories and formats them into an acceptable method to wake us up.</p>
<p>So, what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2005/02/28/interpretation-of-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
