Comments on: Net Neutrality http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/ Still only human Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:27:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: robotgeek http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-2554 robotgeek Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:01:57 +0000 http://robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/#comment-2554 <p>Sure, that is the way it has always been, right?</p> Sure, that is the way it has always been, right?

]]> By: mike http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-2505 mike Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:27:48 +0000 http://robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/#comment-2505 <p>I agree that allowing the telecoms to charge different content providers different rates is a very bad idea. However, why not charge the users? Already, DSL has different levels of service available to users. This would give all content providers a level field, but users who want more, pay more.</p> I agree that allowing the telecoms to charge different content providers different rates is a very bad idea. However, why not charge the users? Already, DSL has different levels of service available to users. This would give all content providers a level field, but users who want more, pay more.

]]> By: hybrid http://www.robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-2397 hybrid Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:56:26 +0000 http://robotgeek.org/blog/2006/05/17/net-neutrality/#comment-2397 <p>THANK YOU! glad to see someone else advocating net neutrality! time to call the senators.</p> <p>Live Free</p> THANK YOU! glad to see someone else advocating net neutrality! time to call the senators.

Live Free

]]>